Does it end in Novanto's withdrawal?

Does it end in novanto's withdrawal? It lays a big question mark for all. People stay in curiosity for the up coming transpiring steps both legal law and ethics that have been the top headlines and trending topic for recent weeks.

The hectic discussion in parlement by the court of honor of parliament almost likely less relevant after the decision of parliament head, mr novanto's formal withdrawal. In coincidence with culmination of the assembly of the court of honor of parliament to decide the fate of novanto, precisely this ex head of parliament fulfilled the wish of nation wide to quit. As what's stated by Novanto himself:" he quits for the national interest that must be preferably more prioritized".

Does it ends in novanto's withdrawal?

From the perspective of ethic, the withdrawal literally answered the main clause of the assembly. Yet, should the Court of honor of parliament releasing no formal decision?
If it's so, consequently, the hectic discussion of parliament court of honor was terminated by itself. For the main  objective was priorly answered through formal decision of head of parliament, mr novanto.
But in formal perspective, honor of court of parliament still have to release their decision even if it appears to be mere symbolism glancely. The formal decisions will accomplish the important sanctions more than withdrawal as the head of parliament or not, depending on the legal consideration of the honor of court.

Should we consider the polemy unresolved yet?

In term of legal law in relevance to the comment of general attorney through some popular mass media, general law insitution is still under the investigation of the case to find possibly the law violation of the ex head of parliament of involving in conspiracy of freeport contract extension. 
This means the alleged profiteeration case concerning freeport contract won't end in ethic violation as the head of parliament. Novanto possibly be subjected to law procedure and take consequence according to legal applicable law. General attorney's office gave the indications to examine Novanto based on legal evidence.

The response of general attorney office indicates signals of the law enforcement which emphasizes the principle of equality. 

Based on this, should it end in novanto's withdrawal? certainly not. The ex head of parliament possibly have to responsible before the law